Marc Steinbach wrote:
> PS: all this applies similarly to proj(x), except that it is not yet
> provided by GCC.
>
It is, for C++0x. Note that the end user is not supposed to use tr1_impl
files directly.
Paolo.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Marc
Steinbach wrote:
> In , GCC defines an additional overload of conj(x)
> for non-complex arithmetic types, as specified in 26.3.9 [cmplx.over]
> of the upcoming C++ Standard (Working Draft).
> The Draft mandates certain type promotion of x.
>
> In the (experimen
In , GCC defines an additional overload of conj(x)
for non-complex arithmetic types, as specified in 26.3.9 [cmplx.over]
of the upcoming C++ Standard (Working Draft).
The Draft mandates certain type promotion of x.
In the (experimental) GCC implementation, conj(x) returns x as a
complex value (wit
