Michael Matz writes:
>> > Indeed, as of r167408, --enable-languages=all includes go.
>>
>> Well, yeah. Isn't that exactly what should happen?
>
> The precedent would be Ada. It is not included in =all, you explicitely
> have to enable it via e.g. =all,ada . I would have thought Go to behave
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> I don't see a ChangeLog file in the gcc/go directory - I take it one will
> be created for all future changes to that directory outside of the
> gofrontend subdirectory?
Yes, and in fact already done as of a few minutes ago.
Ian
Miles Bader writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>> As I just mentioned on the gcc-patches mailing list, I have just
>> committed the Go frontend to mainline.
>
> What's the name of the resulting compiler binary? "ggo"?
gccgo.
Ian
I don't see a ChangeLog file in the gcc/go directory - I take it one will
be created for all future changes to that directory outside of the
gofrontend subdirectory?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Hi,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Joern Rennecke writes:
>
> > Quoting Andrew Pinski :
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>> The Go language is not built by default, so this should not have a
> >>> significant effect on most developers.
> >>
> >
I notice two files in the front end have '#include "ansidecl.h"'.
ansidecl.h is automatically included from config.h so it is not
conventional for files in GCC to include it directly.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Joern Rennecke writes:
> Quoting Andrew Pinski :
>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> The Go language is not built by default, so this should not have a
>>> significant effect on most developers.
>>
>> Hmm, but it looks like it is currently.
>
> Indeed, as of r167408,
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> As I just mentioned on the gcc-patches mailing list, I have just
> committed the Go frontend to mainline.
What's the name of the resulting compiler binary? "ggo"?
-Miles
--
Opposition, n. In politics the party that prevents the Goverment from running
amok by hamstri
Quoting Andrew Pinski :
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The Go language is not built by default, so this should not have a
significant effect on most developers.
Hmm, but it looks like it is currently.
Indeed, as of r167408, --enable-languages=all includes go.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> The Go language is not built by default, so this should not have a
> significant effect on most developers.
Hmm, but it looks like it is currently. Or at least that is how I
understand to read the build failure at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
As I just mentioned on the gcc-patches mailing list, I have just
committed the Go frontend to mainline.
I expect that I will use the gccgo branch going forward as a set of
tested sources for generating Go code. In the next few days I will
complete the final items on the frontend checklist at
http
11 matches
Mail list logo