On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:00:43 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 08:57 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
>> However, there's a failure to combine looking like: (parallel [
>> (set (reg:QI 1 AL)
>> (ior:QI (mem/c/i:QI (reg/f:QI 4 AP) [2 y+0 S1 A16])
>> (reg:Q
On 02/10/2012 08:57 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> However, there's a failure to combine looking like:
> (parallel [
> (set (reg:QI 1 AL)
> (ior:QI (mem/c/i:QI (reg/f:QI 4 AP) [2 y+0 S1 A16])
> (reg:QI 30 [ x+1 ])))
> (clobber (reg:CC 13 CC))
> ])
Why d
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:57:48 +, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> However, duplicating the instructions and inverting operand order seems
> to defeat the purpose of '%'. So, what's the catch? Or is it a genuine
> bug?
I just understood my miss understanding above. '%' is part of constraints
which a
Hi,
I just noticed something strange with my iorqi3 rule.
I have the following:
(define_insn "iorqi3"
[(set (match_operand:QI 0 "register_operand" "=c")
(ior:QI (match_operand:QI 1 "register_operand" "%0")
(match_operand:QI 2 "general_operand" "cwmi")))
(clobber (reg
