On 19 September 2007 23:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I am committing the patch below to our coding conventions and will fix
> up the existing web pages accordingly.
Amusingly enough, this just came out today:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7004661.stm
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't thi
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
> Hyphenated. It's not a line option of a command, it's an option of a
> command-line.
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> As an adjective I think it should be "command-line"; I'm sure Sandra will
> correct me if I'm wrong here.
On Mon, 17 Sep 200
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can
release GCC 4.3.0. ;-)
In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and
"command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choic
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can
> release GCC 4.3.0. ;-)
>
> In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and
> "command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choice
> and document
On 17 September 2007 00:35, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can
> release GCC 4.3.0. ;-)
>
> In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and
> "command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choice
> and d
And now to the most important issue of all to address before we can
release GCC 4.3.0. ;-)
In our current documentation we have both "command-line option" and
"command line option". Like other such cases, we should make a choice
and document this in codingconventions.html.
I am willing to take c
