> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:33:20AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > PS: I'm going to try applying the patch to 3.4 and see if it fixes
> > > tinfo1.C.
> >
> > Meanwhile I'm running a regression hunt for the fix on mainline,
> > which is currently looking between 2005-07-29 and 2005-07-30.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:33:20AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > PS: I'm going to try applying the patch to 3.4 and see if it fixes
> > tinfo1.C.
>
> Meanwhile I'm running a regression hunt for the fix on mainline, which
> is currently looking between 2005-07-29 and 2005-07-30. Perhaps that's
>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > Some more info, the reason hpux only showed one XPASS in 3.4 seems to
> > be that the regexp isn't correct to match the assembler syntax.
> > Patches were installed on mainline but not in 3.4 for mmix and hpux:
> > http://gcc.g
> Some more info, the reason hpux only showed one XPASS in 3.4 seems to
> be that the regexp isn't correct to match the assembler syntax.
> Patches were installed on mainline but not in 3.4 for mmix and hpux:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02513.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
> The last diagnostic in 3.4.x I'm getting from g++ is this:
> XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE:
> XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[
> \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE
> as shown here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg01262.html
>
The last diagnostic in 3.4.x I'm getting from g++ is this:
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE:
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE
as shown here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg01262.html
There are three xfails
