On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 06.08.2010 15:53, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Christophe LYON wrote:
> >
> > > From my brief investigation, I think that the problem is due to the fact
> > > that
> > > struct real_value uses the 'long' type for the 'sig' field,
On 06.08.2010 15:53, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Christophe LYON wrote:
From my brief investigation, I think that the problem is due to the fact that
struct real_value uses the 'long' type for the 'sig' field, while the
computation of REAL_WIDTH relies on HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT.
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Christophe LYON wrote:
> From my brief investigation, I think that the problem is due to the fact that
> struct real_value uses the 'long' type for the 'sig' field, while the
> computation of REAL_WIDTH relies on HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT.
No, this is not a problem; it's fine to
Hello,
I have noticed a build failure with GCC-4.5.0, when configuring with:
--build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--host=arm-none-linux-gnueabi
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi
The build fails when compiling gcc/genconstants.c for the build machine:
In file included from ../../gcc/rtl.h:28,
