On Apr 10 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> How do you access that data base ? NNTP ?
Yes, at news.gmane.io.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On 4/10/20 9:06 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Apr 10 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> Interesting point with gmane.io, do they have a web-interface?
>
> No.
>
Hmm. Not good.
How do you access that data base ? NNTP ?
Bernd.
> Andreas.
>
On Apr 10 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Interesting point with gmane.io, do they have a web-interface?
No.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
On 4/2/20 10:06 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Apr 02 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> What happens to the e-mails when they are not archive, but forwarded
>> to the subscribers, like mark.info who just subscribes the mails,
>> and archived them they have a lot of hard disks for that and can
>>
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list,
> > but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces.
>
> No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that
> bounces, because as the address clearly says, you
On 4/2/20 11:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Bernd Edlinger writes:
>> On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Bernd Edlinger writes:
On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
Bernd Edlinger writes:
> On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Bernd Edlinger writes:
>>> On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> marc.info is an independent site that is no
On 4/2/20 11:09 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:35, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list,
>> but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces.
>
> No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that
> bounces,
On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Bernd Edlinger writes:
>> On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> marc.info is an independent site that is not associated with
> sourc
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:35, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list,
> but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces.
No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that
bounces, because as the address clearly says, you should cont
Bernd Edlinger writes:
> On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
marc.info is an independent site that is not associated with
sourceware.org. We don't control it. If you have questions
On Apr 02 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> What happens to the e-mails when they are not archive, but forwarded
> to the subscribers, like mark.info who just subscribes the mails,
> and archived them they have a lot of hard disks for that and can
> handle attachments quite well. The point is previou
On 4/2/20 7:13 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:57:05PM -0700, Unidef Defshrizzle wrote:
>> We can setup a command line interface, maybe using CURSES, I mean GUIs are
>> fun, but Jesus Christ they’re full of surprises
>
> Command line interface to what?
>
> You can read
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
>that must be fixed by our overseers.
>
>As an example please look at this one:
>https://marc.info/?l=gdb-patches&m=158571308379946&w=2
>
>you see this:
>
>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:57:05PM -0700, Unidef Defshrizzle wrote:
>We can setup a command line interface, maybe using CURSES, I mean GUIs are
>fun, but Jesus Christ they’re full of surprises
Command line interface to what?
You can read email using whatever interface your want. Archives are
obv
We can setup a command line interface, maybe using CURSES, I mean GUIs are
fun, but Jesus Christ they’re full of surprises
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:35 PM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On 4/2/20 1:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:54, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 1 Apr
On 4/2/20 1:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:54, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>>> PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
>>> that must be fixed by our overseers.
>>>
>>> That is the scubbed attachments.
On 4/2/20 12:54 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>> PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
>> that must be fixed by our overseers.
>>
>> That is the scubbed attachments.
>>
>> As an example please look at this one:
>> https://m
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:54, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> > PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
> > that must be fixed by our overseers.
> >
> > That is the scubbed attachments.
> >
> > As an example please look at this one:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:30, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> @overseeers: PLEASE STOP IMMEDIATELY THAT SCRUBBING
You're emailing the gcc list about the gdb-patches mailing list, and
haven't CC'd the overseers list or the gdb list.
> can you act now, or do you need a CVE number first ?
That doesn't seem
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
> that must be fixed by our overseers.
>
> That is the scubbed attachments.
>
> As an example please look at this one:
> https://marc.info/?l=gdb-patches&m=158571308379946&w=2
The c
On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> marc.info is an independent site that is not associated with
>>> sourceware.org. We don't control it. If you have questions about their
>>> site then ask t
On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> I believe the ca
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 18:46 +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
> > As an ex IT guy, I've gone both directions depending on the project I was
> > supporting and certainly see the pros and cons of going highly customized vs
> > as
> > generic as possible
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 06:46:54PM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>I think being software developers we are in this comfortable position
>that we can actually make changes to software ourselves if we find
>problems or usability issues...
>
>For example I found it useful on a couple of occasions t
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
> As an ex IT guy, I've gone both directions depending on the project I was
> supporting and certainly see the pros and cons of going highly customized vs
> as
> generic as possible. In my opinion Chris & Frank are doing the right thing
> here
> and
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>PS: I would CC you, Christopher Faylor, but your email address is
>>"cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@gnu.org", so whatever I send there
>>would not reach you.
>
> Well duh? Not being cc'ed is the literal point of the email address.
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 10:45 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> > PS: I would CC you, Christopher Faylor, but your email address is
> > "cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@gnu.org", so whatever I send there
> > would not reach you.
>
> W
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>PS: I would CC you, Christopher Faylor, but your email address is
>"cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@gnu.org", so whatever I send there
>would not reach you.
Well duh? Not being cc'ed is the literal point of the email address.
Anyway
On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> FWIW, this particular overseer is is also pretty exhausted from the
> effort of moving sourceware to a new system + new software and would not
> relish the effort involved in getting all of this moved to new software.
>
I am sorry, to hear tha
On 3/25/20 10:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:03:15PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>> See the link at the bottom of every page in the old archive:
>> http://www.mhonarc.org/
>>
>>> what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer?
>>
>> It's
On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:34:16PM +0100, Dmitry Mikushin wrote:
>Maybe the best form of question is: Could the Overseer be so kind to
>release the dump of the original old mailing list on any free public file
>server?
The old archives are still available via their old URLs, e.g.,
https://gcc.gnu.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:29:03PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>-On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>>> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days
>>> is
>>> lore.kernel.org, powered by
On 3/25/20 9:29 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Could you add a link to https://marc.info/?l=gcc-patches
Why is above link no longer updating
this is the last message there:
1. 2020-03-07 [5] [PATCH] c++: Fix ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl [P
gcc-patch Jason Merrill
is this a push or a pull wh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:03:15PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> See the link at the bottom of every page in the old archive:
> http://www.mhonarc.org/
>
> > what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer?
>
> It's not packaged for RHEL 8.
It is in EPEL8:
https:/
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 20:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> >> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these
> >> days is
> >> lore.kernel.org, powered by publi
Maybe the best form of question is: Could the Overseer be so kind to
release the dump of the original old mailing list on any free public file
server?
ср, 25 мар. 2020 г. в 21:29, Bernd Edlinger :
> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arsen
-On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days
>> is
>> lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can address
>> most
>> if not al
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days is
>lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can address
>most
>if not all needs of those involved in GCC development and even has NNT
> On 3/25/20 8:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
I do not want to start a flame war.
I just am curious what was the reason why
the old system cannot be used any mo
On 3/25/20 8:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I do not want to start a flame war.
>>>
>>> I just am curious what was the reason why
>>> the old system cannot be used any more?
>>
>> T
On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not want to start a flame war.
>>
>> I just am curious what was the reason why
>> the old system cannot be used any more?
>
> The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for year
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not want to start a flame war.
>
> I just am curious what was the reason why
> the old system cannot be used any more?
The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for years.
> Would there be a possibility to get the old look-a
Hi,
I do not want to start a flame war.
I just am curious what was the reason why
the old system cannot be used any more?
Would there be a possibility to get the old look-and-feel back?
Thanks
Bernd.
45 matches
Mail list logo
