On 5/28/07, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just in case you've forgotten: You posted a patch for h8300 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html>
Yes, but it's got bugs, and it will be more efficient for an actual
h8300 expert to fix them than for me
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:41:32PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I see that many of
> the more popular CPUs have already been done:
>
>alpha arm avr i386 ia64 m68k mips rs6000 s390 spu xtensa
>
> but there are still a lot left to go:
>
>arc bfin c4x cris crx fr30 frv h8300 iq2000 m32c m
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 12:41 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> but there are still a lot left to go:
>
> arc bfin c4x cris crx fr30 frv h8300 iq2000 m32c m32r m68hc11 mcore mmix
> mn10300 mt pa pdp11 score sh sparc stormy16 v850 vax
I can provide the patch for arc sometime soon
regards
saurab
On May 25, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I don't personally have time to convert all ports, and it is
better if
people who know each individual backend and have access to hardware
do the conversions, anyway. So I'd like to invite port
maintainers to
convert their ports in this d
> I don't personally have time to convert all ports, and it is better if
> people who know each individual backend and have access to hardware
> do the conversions, anyway. So I'd like to invite port maintainers to
> convert their ports in this development cycle. I see that many of
> the more p
Back in 2006 I added a mechanism for defining machine-specific
constraints in the MD file rather than with C macros. This mechanism
offers several advantages over the old way of doing it, but until all
ports are converted, we can't actually implement some of those -- most
important, perhaps, is th
