* Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-29 14:54]:
> > GCC 4.1 itself appears to be very stable, both on MIPS and AMD64.
>
> Thank you for doing this, and for reporting the results, and for filing
> the bugs!
I've done the same with a snapshot of GCC 4.2 now on AMD64 (x86_64),
and I'm curren
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Summary:
>
> GCC 4.1 itself appears to be very stable, both on MIPS and AMD64.
Thank you for doing this, and for reporting the results, and for filing
the bugs!
This is, in my opinion, pretty good news for GCC.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(6
Hi,
well too bad some news sites pick this mail up as rather bad news for
the GCC compiler and project as it.
However the opposite is the truth, I'm a long term system integrator
contributing to ROCK Linux since 1998 and nowadays leading the
T2 SDE fork of it. It is a development environment allo
Summary:
GCC 4.1 itself appears to be very stable, both on MIPS and AMD64.
There are, however, a large number of packages using code (especially
C++) which GCC 4.1 treats as errors. Fortunately, most of them are
trivial to fix. By compiling about 6200 packages, over 500 new
bugs have been discov
Over the last 2.5 weeks I have built the complete Debian archive
on a quad-core MIPS machine donated by Broadcom using the recently
released version 4.1 of GCC. In parallel, I have done the same
on an EM64T box donated to Debian by Intel.
The purpose of this exercise was three-fold:
- Find out a
