On 8/25/17, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 16/08/17 18:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>> I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that
>>> the server restore is now complete?
>>
>> No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrup
On 16/08/17 18:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that
>> the server restore is now complete?
>
> No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrupted or
> missing files by comparison wi
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
> >> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
>
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote:
> I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that
> the server restore is now complete?
No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrupted or
missing files by comparison with the last backup.
My expectation is that all
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>
>> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
>> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
>> message looks like this:
>
> Bugzilla and the res
On 8/15/17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
>>> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
>>> message looks
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >
> > > It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840
> > > was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.o
On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840
was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html
(Strangely, 81841 is there, as is 8
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
> It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840
> was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html
>
> (Strangely, 81841 is there, as is 81839.)
That's another 81839 replac
On 08/15/2017 07:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
message looks like
On 15/08/17 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
>> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
>> message looks like this:
>
> Bugzilla and the rest of gcc.gnu.org h
On 15 August 2017 at 04:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>
>> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I
>> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error
>> message looks like this:
Even if it were possible, the
d: by 10.80.215.68 with SMTP id i4mr25610854edj.258.1502748228995;
Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.129.227 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Gallager
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:03:48 -0400
Message-ID:
Subject: GCC bugzilla dow
octoploid writes:
>> Actually, the whole gcc.gnu.org since yesterday seems rather flaky. At
>> the moment it works fine for me, though.
>
> Same symptoms as those on kernel.org
In gcc.gnu.org's case, apparently this was being caused by someone
hammering on the bugzilla server. A case of exces
Paolo Carlini oracle.com> writes:
>
> On 10/06/2011 04:41 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> > Suddenly bugzilla went down.
> > Am I the only one seeing this?
> Actually, the whole gcc.gnu.org since yesterday seems rather flaky. At
> the moment it works fine for me, though.
Same symptoms as those on
On 06/10/11 15:41, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
Suddenly bugzilla went down.
Am I the only one seeing this?
Opps, now sorted.
--
PMatos
On 10/06/2011 04:41 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
Suddenly bugzilla went down.
Am I the only one seeing this?
Actually, the whole gcc.gnu.org since yesterday seems rather flaky. At
the moment it works fine for me, though.
Paolo.
Suddenly bugzilla went down.
Am I the only one seeing this?
--
PMatos
18 matches
Mail list logo
