Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-31 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:46:27PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > For AVR -- an other port affected by cc0 removal -- there is a > LLVM/Clang port. It' not as mature as GCC's avr port, but what counts > in the end is support / responsiveness from the community and an > openness for the requir

Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-31 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb: On 10/31/19 10:00 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: I didn't follow the lists for some time... At least neither v9 or v10 release notes caveats mention such deprecation, neither is there respective PRs for the cc0 targets. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09

Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-31 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/31/19 10:00 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> I didn't follow the lists for some time...  At least neither v9 or v10 >>> release notes caveats mention such deprecation, neither is there >>> respective PRs for the cc0 targets. >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01256.html >> >>

Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-31 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Peter Bergner schrieb: On 10/30/19 2:31 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Hi, have the cc0 backends been deprecated? I didn't follow the lists for some time... At least neither v9 or v10 release notes caveats mention such deprecation, neither is there respective PRs for the cc0 targets. https://gc

Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-30 Thread Peter Bergner
On 10/30/19 2:31 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Hi, have the cc0 backends been deprecated? > > I didn't follow the lists for some time...  At least neither v9 or v10 > release notes caveats mention such deprecation, neither is there > respective PRs for the cc0 targets. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

Re: BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-30 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb: Hello! For anyone who isn't aware of it yet, there is an ongoing BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851 [1] which seeks to convert the m68k backend to MODE_CC so that it can be kept in gcc versions beyond version 11. Hi, have the cc0 backends been depre

BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851

2019-10-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! For anyone who isn't aware of it yet, there is an ongoing BountySource campaign for gcc PR/91851 [1] which seeks to convert the m68k backend to MODE_CC so that it can be kept in gcc versions beyond version 11. The campaign is currently at $3,290 and can be found at [2]. Thanks, A