On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
To stop the annoying VM randomization you need to turn on
the old style VM layout in the kernel. Grrr.
I believe detailed instructions on the ways to disable VM
randomization
in the GCC wiki would be a welcomed addition by many GCC hackers
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
>
> And is under investigation:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
>
So, here's what appears to be happening.
1. A statement i
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:42 -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
> >
> > And is under investigation:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 15:02 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 14:57, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>
> > No, this is not sufficient.
> >
> *shrug* that works for me without the legacy_va_layout setting.
>
> $ sysctl vm.legacy_va_layout
> vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
>
> (On 2.6.14-1.165
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 14:57, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> No, this is not sufficient.
>
*shrug* that works for me without the legacy_va_layout setting.
$ sysctl vm.legacy_va_layout
vm.legacy_va_layout = 0
(On 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4smp)
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:51 -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 14:47, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > Please, post instructions about how to turn on the old style VM layout
> > in the kernel. Sooner or later, many of us on this list will need to
> > know...
> >
> Adding this to /e
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 14:47, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Please, post instructions about how to turn on the old style VM layout
> in the kernel. Sooner or later, many of us on this list will need to
> know...
>
Adding this to /etc/sysctl.conf works for me:
# Do not randomize memory addresses
kern
Jeffrey A Law writes:
> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
> >
> > And is under investigation:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
> Finally!
>
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
>
> And is under investigation:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
Finally!
To stop the annoying VM randomization you need to tur
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
>
> And is under investigation:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
Hmmm, I'm still having trouble disabling this (*&@#$ address
sp
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 19:31 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
>
> And is under investigation:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
Still under investigation. Very little happened over the last
Hi Rainer, this is PR24994:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24994
And is under investigation:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01756.html
Laurent
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 16:52 +0100, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bootstrap fai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bootstrap failed in stage 3 on building gprmake:
../../gnatmake -c -I../rts -I.
- -I/raid/tecosim/it/devel/projects/develtools/src/gcc-4.2/gcc/ada gprmake
- --GCC="../../xgcc -B../../ -O2 -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata"
../../xgcc -c -I./ -I../rts -I.
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
