[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/06/2007 01:17:34:
> > I tested it on powerpc64-linux with the default option
> > --with-cpu=default32.
>
> Ah, so this is a 32-bit compiler like on sparc64-linux?
--with-cpu=default32 means that the compiler itself and it's produced
code are 32 bits by default.
Re
> I tested it on powerpc64-linux with the default option
> --with-cpu=default32.
Ah, so this is a 32-bit compiler like on sparc64-linux?
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/06/2007 21:50:57:
> > I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
>
> SPARC/Solaris 64-bit is OK, as well as IA-64/Linux according to:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01044.html
>
> Do you test PowerPC 32-bit or should I try a build on
> I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
SPARC/Solaris 64-bit is OK, as well as IA-64/Linux according to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01044.html
Do you test PowerPC 32-bit or should I try a build on Darwin or AIX?
--
Eric Botcazou
> Maybe the problem will arise on other platforms and we'll be able to debug
> it.
SPARC/Solaris 32-bit is OK. I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/06/2007 21:10:15:
> > I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK I can check Ada on
> > an older revision if you wish.
>
> I'm not sure that would really help in this case. The fact that x86 and
> x86-64 are both clean with structural alia
> I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK I can check Ada on
> an older revision if you wish.
I'm not sure that would really help in this case. The fact that x86 and
x86-64 are both clean with structural alias analysis would seem to show
that there is no fundamental bad interaction
> Note that if cc1-checksum.o differs, it likely means the issue is unrelated
> to Ada.
cc1-checksum.o very offen differs on my machine, it doesn't stop the build.
--
Eric Botcazou
> >
> > Which revision? The Ada compiler bootstraps fine on i586 and x86-64 at
> > revision 125912:125915M (i.e with structural alias analysis enabled).
>
> Note that if cc1-checksum.o differs, it likely means the issue is
unrelated to
> Ada.
I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK
> Which revision? The Ada compiler bootstraps fine on i586 and x86-64 at
> revision 125912:125915M (i.e with structural alias analysis enabled).
>
revision 125915.
Thanks,
Revital
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
> > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
> > rm -f stage_current
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
> > Comparing stages 2 and 3
> > warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
> > Boot
> I get the following bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64
> for Ada (--enable-languages=ada) with BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2'.
>
> Revital
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/b
Hello,
I get the following bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64
for Ada (--enable-languages=ada) with BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2'.
Revital
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
rm -f
13 matches
Mail list logo
