Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:07 AM, FX wrote:
>> I know something is going on with section names, so I thought I'd mention
>> that there is a big regression on darwin (most "-flto -fwhopr -O2" tests
>> fail) at rev. 155544. An example is:
>
> Really lto should be disabled whe
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:07 AM, FX wrote:
> I know something is going on with section names, so I thought I'd mention
> that there is a big regression on darwin (most "-flto -fwhopr -O2" tests
> fail) at rev. 155544. An example is:
Really lto should be disabled when targeting darwin. See PR 41
I know something is going on with section names, so I thought I'd mention that
there is a big regression on darwin (most "-flto -fwhopr -O2" tests fail) at
rev. 155544. An example is:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010313-1.c -O2 -fwhopr (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/var/folders/UV/U
