J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> p7zip-4.57
> [...]
> 1. 1m50s compile, 1630164 file, 1618639 text, 6120 data, 27168 bss, 5m50s run.
> 2. 1m53s compile, 1665952 file, 1649829 text, 4668 data, 29160 bss, 6m04s run.
> 3. 2m08s compile, 1629088 file, 1613313 text, 4672 data, 29
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:02:34AM +, Martin Guy wrote:
> Is there a clause in regressions for "takes longer to compile and
> produces worse code"?
Worse code is a regression, so is slower compile time. Both are
judgement calls; some of them are not going to be changed, but safe
patches chang
2008/2/29, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here are the results of benchmarks of 3 compressors: 7z, bzip2 and gzip, and
> GCCs 3.4.6, 4.1.3-20080225, 4.2.4-20080227, 4.3.0-20080228 & 4.4.0-20080222.
Thanks, that's very interesting. I had noticed 4.2 producing 10%
larger and 10% slower code fo
Here are the results of benchmarks of 3 compressors: 7z, bzip2 and gzip, and
GCCs 3.4.6, 4.1.3-20080225, 4.2.4-20080227, 4.3.0-20080228 & 4.4.0-20080222.
--
# User's time is taken, machine is Ath64 3200+ 2.0 GHz x1, 64+64K
