> I see one case that seems really stupid, and one that's just wrong. I'm
> thinking that either I have something really flawed with my port's handing
> of DImode or that there was a bug in 4.6.1.The port is only failing
> about 2100 dejagnu tests (passing 64000+) and a good chunk of the failu
So, I found the patch to do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx() by Eric Botcazou that
should address the stupid code and the redundant branch.
Should have done a broader search before I wasted email bandwidth...
On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
> I'm looking at code generated for a new
I'm looking at code generated for a new port of gcc using 4.6.1 and failing
execute/950607-2.c with -O0 only
The target chip has only 32 bit instructions, so it's using
do_jump_by_parts__rtx() to expand the compare.
I've set up my .md to use the CCmode.
I see one case that seems really stupid
