Re: Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

2008-04-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
Laurent GUERBY wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:07 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: Beyond those, I am left with: All targets had the following three failures: c64005c - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." c64005d - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." c953002

Re: Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

2008-04-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
Laurent GUERBY wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:07 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: Beyond those, I am left with: All targets had the following three failures: c64005c - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." c64005d - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." c953002

Re: Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

2008-04-05 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:07 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Beyond those, I am left with: > > > All targets had the following three failures: > > c64005c - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." > c64005d - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH." > c953002 - "WRONG IT

Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

2008-04-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
I posted Ada ACATS results this morning for 4 targets (i386, powerpc, sparc, and mips) to gcc-testresults. In general, they were very good -- the powerpc only had 3 ACATS failures and those were cross target. Compiler version: 4.4.0 20080403 (experimental) [trunk revision 133868] The sparc ha