On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 05:22:41PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> The case where this matters is a 32-bit ELF EABI target (the only case
> on powerpc that allows 8-byte stack alignment) using -maltivec but not
> -mabi=no-altivec. It's not clear to me that case works.
I was originally worried ab
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sure this has come up before, but I don't understand how the
> -maltivec definition of STACK_BOUNDARY can be right. We tell the
> compiler that STACK_BOUNDARY == 128 if -maltivec, without telling it
> that other people may ignore that, because -
I'm sure this has come up before, but I don't understand how the
-maltivec definition of STACK_BOUNDARY can be right. We tell the
compiler that STACK_BOUNDARY == 128 if -maltivec, without telling it
that other people may ignore that, because -maltivec is not supposed
to be an ABI changing option b
