Romain Failliot writes:
> 2005/11/13, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There is a GCC front end, but it has zero chance of being integrated
> > into FSF GCC at this stage. The run-time library license contains
> > this little gem:
> >
> > * (ii) Any derived versions of t
On 11/13/2005 02:13 PM, Brian Makin wrote:
[snip]
If some folks are interested we should talk to the D
people and suggest an acceptable D frontend.
I for one would be willing to pitch in.
There's already one, IIUC:
The link below seems like a more mature effort (it even work
On 11/13/2005 02:13 PM, Brian Makin wrote:
[snip]
If some folks are interested we should talk to the D
people and suggest an acceptable D frontend.
I for one would be willing to pitch in.
There's already one, IIUC:
http://www.opend.org/
Romain Failliot wrote:
Yes, but you have to be careful, with a license statement like
the above, you probably have to adopt a chinese wall strategy,
i.e. anyone who has seen the run time library that is so
licensed should not be allowed to work on the implementation of
the replacement.
David s
> Yes, but you have to be careful, with a license statement like
> the above, you probably have to adopt a chinese wall strategy,
> i.e. anyone who has seen the run time library that is so
> licensed should not be allowed to work on the implementation of
> the replacement.
David send me a more exp
Romain Failliot wrote:
2005/11/13, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There is a GCC front end, but it has zero chance of being integrated
into FSF GCC at this stage. The run-time library license contains
this little gem:
* (ii) Any derived versions of this software (howsoever m
2005/11/13, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is a GCC front end, but it has zero chance of being integrated
> into FSF GCC at this stage. The run-time library license contains
> this little gem:
>
> * (ii) Any derived versions of this software (howsoever
> modified)
> *
> Is it plan to add the D language in the ones that
are supported by
GCC
> by default?
I have been following the D language for some time.
In many ways it mirrors my own ideas on language
design. In my oppinion the biggest thing holding it
back is the lack of good tools.
If some folks are inte
* Romain Failliot:
> Is it plan to add the D language in the ones that are supported by GCC
> by default?
There is a GCC front end, but it has zero chance of being integrated
into FSF GCC at this stage. The run-time library license contains
this little gem:
* (ii) Any derived vers
On Nov 12, 2005, at 5:06 PM, Romain Failliot wrote:
Is it plan to add the D language in the ones that are supported by GCC
by default?
No plans I'm aware of, but, asking the D folks would be more
productive than asking us.
Hi!
I read some documentation about D programming language and began to
test few .d files/modules. I think the D language is promising, and
even if it has a garbage collector, it seems to be a good alternative
in front of Java and .Net languages since it implements everything
that quite every deve
11 matches
Mail list logo
