Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2

2005-07-24 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
>> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins >> that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f >> and clog10l. > > Ok. Commited. Thanks, FX

Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2

2005-07-21 Thread Richard Henderson
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:46:34AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote: > * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins > that C99 reserve for future use. Use it to define clog10, clog10f > and clog10l. Ok. r~

Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2

2005-07-19 Thread FX Coudert
OK to commit? Ping. This problem is really blocking a very nice gfortran feature (support for large real kinds). Since it is very short, could someone review it? FX 2005-07-19 Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * builtins.def: Add DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN to define builtins

Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2

2005-07-02 Thread FX Coudert
The fortran front-end needs to recognize clog10, clog10f and clog10l a proper built-ins. Attached patch tries to add them to clog10, under a new category: DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (as suggested by jsm28). Can someone review this? Is it OK? Just realized I forgot the ChangeLog entry to go with it.

Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2

2005-06-29 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
The fortran front-end needs to recognize clog10, clog10f and clog10l a proper built-ins. Attached patch tries to add them to clog10, under a new category: DEF_EXT_C99RES_BUILTIN (as suggested by jsm28). Can someone review this? Is it OK? Thanks, François-Xavier Index: gcc/builtins.def ===