On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:39 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> I'll look at the DejaGnu aspects of the patch and comment on them, but
> someone involved with Ada should maintain it.
Sounds fair, but then don't hesitate to add comments in the patch
so dejagnu illiterates don't feel lost :).
Thanks for
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:05:29PM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:45 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
> > general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
> > curre
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:45 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
> general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
> current ACATS tests, which cannot be used for regression tests). The
> patch was no
> I thought that there were some reservations about changing the ACATS
> test suite.
I do not remember anything like that. Also, we're not talking about changing
the ACATS test suite, but rather expanding it.
> So how we can make sure that this work is not lost? Who would be in a
> position to a
* Arnaud Charlet:
>> Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
>> general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
>> current ACATS tests, which cannot be used for regression tests). The
>
> Note that this is technica
> Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
> general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
> current ACATS tests, which cannot be used for regression tests). The
Note that this is technically incorrect: the ACATS infrastructure can
be
Some time ago, someone posted a patch which provided beginnings of a
general-purpose Ada test suite infrastructure (in addition to the
current ACATS tests, which cannot be used for regression tests). The
patch was not integrated, and I can't find it at the moment. 8-(
Does anybody know
