Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:45 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
34400 is about slow compile but not about wrong code so I doubt it's the
issue. Could you send me privately the compressed log of the ACATS run?
Sure.
>From the log it looks like the reason f
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:45 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > 34400 is about slow compile but not about wrong code so I doubt it's the
> > issue. Could you send me privately the compressed log of the ACATS run?
> Sure.
>From the log it looks like the reason for most test FAIL is
because an expecte
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 13:41 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
ACATS is clean (0 FAIL) on trunk for x86. CXF3A03 is the
only FAIL for hppa-linux. c41328a is the only FAIL for powerpc64-linux.
cxb3014/16 are the only FAIL on ia64-linux.
You'll quickl
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 13:41 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > ACATS is clean (0 FAIL) on trunk for x86. CXF3A03 is the
> > only FAIL for hppa-linux. c41328a is the only FAIL for powerpc64-linux.
> > cxb3014/16 are the only FAIL on ia64-linux.
> >
> > You'll quickly find up to
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
ACATS is clean (0 FAIL) on trunk for x86. CXF3A03 is the
only FAIL for hppa-linux. c41328a is the only FAIL for powerpc64-linux.
cxb3014/16 are the only FAIL on ia64-linux.
You'll quickly find up to date ACATS results here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/
ACATS is clean (0 FAIL) on trunk for x86. CXF3A03 is the
only FAIL for hppa-linux. c41328a is the only FAIL for powerpc64-linux.
cxb3014/16 are the only FAIL on ia64-linux.
You'll quickly find up to date ACATS results here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-12/
Laurent
On Fri, 2007-12-
Hi,
Even with the large gnat1 compile time issue, I
have managed to patiently run the ACATS on
powerpc-rtems. This configuration worked
well with gcc 4.2.2 (3 failures). I am seeing
lot of failures (total of 691) and they do not
appear to be RTEMS related.
Here is a sample. Do any of these lo
