Re: GSoC 2025 – Excited About GCC Go Escape Analysis & Seeking Guidance

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:35 AM Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On 2025-03-31T19:48:16+0530, Astha Pipania via Gcc wrote: > > I hope you're doing well! > > Astha, welcome to GCC! > > > I'm incredibly excited about the "GCC Go Escape > > Analysis" project for GSoC 2025. > > ... which is listed on >

Re: GSoC 2025 – Excited About GCC Go Escape Analysis & Seeking Guidance

Hi Astha, Ian! On 2025-03-31T19:48:16+0530, Astha Pipania via Gcc wrote: > I hope you're doing well! Astha, welcome to GCC! > I'm incredibly excited about the "GCC Go Escape > Analysis" project for GSoC 2025. ... which is listed on

GSoC 2025 – Excited About GCC Go Escape Analysis & Seeking Guidance

I hope you're doing well! I'm incredibly excited about the "GCC Go Escape Analysis" project for GSoC 2025. I've spent time reviewing past contributions, including the 2024 work related to Go in GCC, and I’m eager to build on that progress in a meaningful way. After going through the mailing lists

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

On 26/09/2023 08:48, weizhe wang via Gcc wrote: Thanks for your reply. Is there some guide for building rv32 cross compiler gcc ? I encounter some error in the building progress. You might find useful information here:

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

Thanks for your reply. Is there some guide for building rv32 cross compiler gcc ? I encounter some error in the building progress. Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/ On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:40:51 -0700 Jonathan Wakely wrote --- On Tue, 26 Sept 2023, 03:11 weizhe wang

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

On Tue, 26 Sept 2023, 03:11 weizhe wang via Gcc, wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > > Can we build risv-32 gcc compiler from official gcc repository ? > Yes, lots of people do that. > > > Thanks, > > > > Flint > > > > Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/ > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2023

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

Hi Guys,   Can we build risv-32 gcc compiler from official gcc repository ? Thanks, Flint Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/ On Thu, 02 Feb 2023 05:21:36 -0800 Martin Jambor wrote --- Hello Flint, On Sat, Jan 28 2023, hmsjwzb via Gcc wrote: > Hi GCC develope

Outdated paragraph in ABOUT-GCC-NLS

There is this paragraph in ABOUT-GCC_NLS: By and large, only diagnostic messages have been internationalized. Some work remains in other areas; for example, GCC does not yet allow non-ASCII letters in identifiers. It seems like this hasn't been true since GCC 10. I can see in release notes:

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

Hello Flint, On Sat, Jan 28 2023, hmsjwzb via Gcc wrote: > Hi GCC developers, > > I am learning GCC. But the GCC code is hard to understand. We are delighted you found looking into GCC interesting. I definitely agree that GCC source can be hard to read, especially for newcomers but often e

seek advice about GCC learning

Hi GCC developers, I am learning GCC. But the GCC code is hard to understand. I'm reading the c compiler of GCC. It seems the understanding of AST/GENERIC representation is very important. Is there a tool can visualize the AST/GENERIC representation? Do you have

Re: Doubts about GCC advancement (GSoC)

Hello, I am delighted you found contributing to GCC interesting. Sorry for the delay in replying. I am adding the GCC mailing list in case other GCC developers have something to add to my reply. It is usually a good idea to email the list and not an individual, if only because most of the commu

Re: Question about 'gcc/fold-const.c:fold_convert_loc' for 'real_cst' -> 'reference_type' of 'real_type'

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Per the 'fold_convert_loc' code (cited below), we see that for 'type' of > 'case INTEGER_TYPE' etc. -- which 'type' of 'case REFERENCE_TYPE' does > "fall through" into -- we do not handle 'arg' of 'REAL_CST' like we do > for 'type'

Question about 'gcc/fold-const.c:fold_convert_loc' for 'real_cst' -> 'reference_type' of 'real_type'

Hi! In a development branch based on devel/omp/gcc-10 branch (og10), which is based on releases/gcc-10 branch, I'm running into the following issue. But: the master branch code seems to look the same. Given a specific scenario, we run into an ICE: during GIMPLE pass: oaccdevlow dump file

Re: Question about GCC not warning for some noncompliant SEI CERT C code examples

On 5/30/19 8:28 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 5/30/19 3:12 AM, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote: >> Hi >> >> When reading the SEI CERT C Coding Standard rules, looking at >> "DCL30-C. Declare objects with appropriate storage durations" >> it seem like GCC does not warn in compile-time for some noncomplian

Re: Question about GCC not warning for some noncompliant SEI CERT C code examples

On 5/30/19 3:12 AM, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote: Hi When reading the SEI CERT C Coding Standard rules, looking at "DCL30-C. Declare objects with appropriate storage durations" it seem like GCC does not warn in compile-time for some noncompliant examples. I know eg AddressSanitizer and several ru

Question about GCC not warning for some noncompliant SEI CERT C code examples

Hi When reading the SEI CERT C Coding Standard rules, looking at "DCL30-C. Declare objects with appropriate storage durations" it seem like GCC does not warn in compile-time for some noncompliant examples. I know eg AddressSanitizer and several runtime running tools finds these bugs, but it would

Re: Question about gcc options '-mapcs-stack-check' and '-mapcs-frame'

On 24/08/18 14:51, Akhilesh chirlancha wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm using gcc 5.4.0 for armhf target. > > I was compiling simple stack over flow test code with '-mapcs-stack-check' > option. > # gcc -mapcs-stack-check test.c > test.c:1:0: warning: -mapcs-stack-check incompatible with -mno-apcs-fra

Question about gcc options '-mapcs-stack-check' and '-mapcs-frame'

Hello All, I'm using gcc 5.4.0 for armhf target. I was compiling simple stack over flow test code with '-mapcs-stack-check' option. # gcc -mapcs-stack-check test.c test.c:1:0: warning: -mapcs-stack-check incompatible with -mno-apcs-frame #include ^ As per my understanding from the above warnin

Re: Question about GCC benchmarks and uninitialized variables

On 24/07/18 09:40, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote: > Hi > > This is a general question to all you working with GCC benchmarking. > > I have been working with code benchmarks like CSiBE for ARM. From > time to time unpredicted results appears where numbers gets worse by > no reason. > > When looking

Re: Question about GCC benchmarks and uninitialized variables

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote: > So my question is how to approach this problems when doing benchmarking, > ofcourse we want the benchmark to mirror as near as 'real life' code as > possible. But if code contains real bugs, and issues that could cause > unpredictable code genera

Question about GCC benchmarks and uninitialized variables

Hi This is a general question to all you working with GCC benchmarking. I have been working with code benchmarks like CSiBE for ARM. >From time to time unpredicted results appears where numbers gets worse by no >reason. When looking into what could cause this unpredictable behaviour, I found th

Re: Blog post about gcc 8 usability improvements

On 3/15/18, David Malcolm wrote: > Sorry for the shameless self-promotion, but I've written up the work > I've done on gcc 8 usability, in blog form, here: > > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/03/15/gcc-8-usability-improvements/ > > I'm working on a patch for the website's changes.html, cov

Blog post about gcc 8 usability improvements

Sorry for the shameless self-promotion, but I've written up the work I've done on gcc 8 usability, in blog form, here: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/03/15/gcc-8-usability-improvements/ I'm working on a patch for the website's changes.html, covering the same material. Dave

Re: question about GCC Wiki

On 07/29/2017 07:37 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 01:08:35PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: ...or more precisely, about MoinMoin hyperlink formatting. I'd like to insert hyperlinks to anchors in the GCC HTML manual on some Wiki pages. Specifically, I'd like to be able to li

Re: question about GCC Wiki

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 01:08:35PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > ...or more precisely, about MoinMoin hyperlink formatting. > > I'd like to insert hyperlinks to anchors in the GCC HTML manual > on some Wiki pages. Specifically, I'd like to be able to link > to the description of a command line opt

question about GCC Wiki

...or more precisely, about MoinMoin hyperlink formatting. I'd like to insert hyperlinks to anchors in the GCC HTML manual on some Wiki pages. Specifically, I'd like to be able to link to the description of a command line option or an attribute, and I'd also like to render the text of the link i

Re: Could you please clarify about GCC optimizations?

Got it. Thank you. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/08/14 06:18, Evgeniya Maenkova wrote: >> >> As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x >> backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization >> could improve performance in one con

Re: Could you please clarify about GCC optimizations?

On 08/08/14 06:18, Evgeniya Maenkova wrote: As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization could improve performance in one configuration and degrade at other conditions. Correct. What performance tests do

Could you please clarify about GCC optimizations?

Dear GCC Developers! May I ask you regarding how you make a decision whether implement some optimization or not? As far as I know, there are so many configurations (frontends x backends x applications(benchmarks) x etc), that the same optimization could improve performance in one configuration and

Re: setcontext et al. functions (was: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.)

Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 11 Jun 2013 10:27:09 +0200, a écrit : > Anyway, Samuel, would you please > put the current »tg patch t/context_functions« as a new patch into the > Debian glibc package? Yep, it is done, waiting for next upload. Samuel

setcontext et al. functions (was: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.)

Hi! On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:04:02 +0200, I wrote: > As for the roadblock: > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Thomas Schwinge > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On I have ju

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > > Last but not least, I would like to know if you have some other proposition > for me. Mr Ian could have a suggestion for the go part perhaps? Make sure you can build and modify gccgo for some other target, e.g., GNU/Linux. I don't eve

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Hi! One suggestion up-front: I think the GCC mailing lists (or generally all hosted on sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org) are configured to drop HTML email, so you may want to adjust your MUA. On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:19:17 +0300, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > > Replacing the (legacy) threadvars > > mecha

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Hi! On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:23:49 +0300, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > A link to it can be found here: > https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/nlightnfotis/1 > (I > hope it is publicly visible, it seems to me it is). > > Of course, I am more than open to comments/cr

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Hi Fotis, I finally found my changes made so far for gccgo on a computer suffering double hard disk crashes. Hopefully most of the changes are available on the backup I found. As it looks they were not too extensive. I'll send a patch asap to the bug-hurd list, so you can continue from there (when

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On I have just > updated/posted a getcontext/makecontext/setcontext/swapcontext usage > analysis. This might constitute a "road block": the Hurd currently does > not allow for cha

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Hi! I'm sorry for the late answer. Ian, there's a question for you towards the bottom of the email. On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:22:15 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Fotis Koutoulakis > wrote: > > > > I am writing this email with regard to a potential project idea

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Ian Lance Taylor, le Mon 25 Mar 2013 08:22:15 -0700, a écrit : > > - What would be a skill level estimate for someone wishing to try this > > project in an attempt to get his feet wet in compiler engineering? > > Unfortunately it's hard for me to judge. The most important skill > would be the abi

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > > I am writing this email with regard to a potential project idea that's > hosted on the GCC wiki about porting the go programming language GCC > (gccgo) frontend to the GNU/HURD operating system (information found > here-> http://gcc.gnu

Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Greetings, I am writing this email with regard to a potential project idea that's hosted on the GCC wiki about porting the go programming language GCC (gccgo) frontend to the GNU/HURD operating system (information found here-> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode and here-> http://www.gnu.org/soft

Re: question about GCC Quad-Precision Math Library

Dear Samuel, (I copy this email to the gcc@gcc.gnu.org list, as this is the home for discussions of this library.) You can't use the libquadmath library with an ANSI-C compiler. You need a compiler that supports the __float128 type and operations on it (such as multiplications, as you mention)

Re: "White paper" about GCC front-end internals

On 2011-3-7 5:29, Andi Hellmund wrote: Hey ALL, after some time of source code investigations, testing and experiments, I finally bundled my experiences with GCC front-ends in a "white paper" about the internals of GCC front-ends. It is not really structured like a tutorial, but it should hopefu

"White paper" about GCC front-end internals

Hey ALL, after some time of source code investigations, testing and experiments, I finally bundled my experiences with GCC front-ends in a "white paper" about the internals of GCC front-ends. It is not really structured like a tutorial, but it should hopefully be usuable by GCC newbies to spee

Re: question about GCC

On 2 June 2010 22:42, manal habib wrote: > Hi, > > I am new into the field of coding, and I am wandering if I can get > some help on how to use the GCC? I have a mac version 10.5.8.   Should > I just copy one of the image folders to make computer?  how can use > it? This is not the right mailing l

question about GCC

Hi, I am new into the field of coding, and I am wandering if I can get some help on how to use the GCC? I have a mac version 10.5.8. Should I just copy one of the image folders to make computer? how can use it? Thank you very much Manal Habib

Re: Fw: quesitons about gcc 4.4.1

lin li writes: > I have some questions about GCC/G++ 4.4.1. The first questions is > that we find that the gcc compiler support some C99 extensions by > default. For example, the gcc 4.4 document says "New character data > types, per TR 19769: New character types in C, are

Fw: quesitons about gcc 4.4.1

Dear Sir/Madam, I have some questions about GCC/G++ 4.4.1. The first questions is that we find that the gcc compiler support some C99 extensions by default. For example, the gcc 4.4 document says "New character data types, per TR 19769: New character types in C, are now supported for

question about gcc compiler

Good day! We`d like to use a compiler gcc to compile our application. I know that gcc exists under special exception which allows to use it for commercial application. I have 2 questions: If we use a static linking with gcc  -  should we distribute our application on the terms of GPL?  or ca

Re: Several puzzles about gcc top level makefile

Thanks very much, Ian Lance Taylor . I will go deeper into the makefiles.

Re: Several puzzles about gcc top level makefile

"Cheng bin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1 : At the end of that makefile , There is a section noted as > "Regenerating top level configury". > It is clear what it do, but for what? Where is this piece of > code used in building procedure? Those pieces of code are used by developers if and

Several puzzles about gcc top level makefile

Hi Groups: Right now I am studying the procedure of building gcc(mipsel cross compiler), so I look into the makefiles generated by configure procedure. This message is about the top level makefile, I got most of it (It's some kind of well structured) except several puzzles as following 1 : At

Re: Curious about gcc v4.1.2, x86 assembly, and stack overallocation

gdb guy wrote: > If I have the following code: > > > Basically I'm just curious to understand why gcc adds this extra space. The stack pointer is always 16-aligned. Does that help? Andrew.

Curious about gcc v4.1.2, x86 assembly, and stack overallocation

If I have the following code: struct bob{ int a; char b[8]; int c; }; struct bob barker; ... void sub1(unsigned int size){ int someflag=0; struct bob dole; memcpy(&dole.b,&barker.b,size); } let's say I call the code as sub(8) (the code is intentiona

help pls, about gcc-3.0.1 on HP unix

hi Tapani Tarvainen, sorry for interrupt you. I searched a your mail in gnu-gcc maillist. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-01/msg00062.html you said you have installed gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11, but I really wasn't successfull on it. my step: export CC=/opt/hp-gcc/bin/gcc (the gcc is binary gcc-3.

Re: Newbie questions about gcc / glibc

"Frederich, Eric P21322" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a bunch of command line programs and I am trying to support > Windows, Linux and an older version of Solaris. > I got the same version of gcc working on all 3 platforms. > > Now the problem is that I can't get getopt_long to work which

Re: Newbie questions about gcc / glibc

> I saw getopt.h, getopt.c, and getopt1.c in my gcc directory under > libiberty. What are these for? Those are for building gcc itself. They're not normally used by applications, unless you want to import all of libiberty into your application. Normally, glibc provides the getopt family of fun

Newbie questions about gcc / glibc

Hello, I have a bunch of command line programs and I am trying to support Windows, Linux and an older version of Solaris. I got the same version of gcc working on all 3 platforms. Now the problem is that I can't get getopt_long to work which is provided by getopt.h. I don't know much about how al

RE: Can I have a more detailed documentation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend?

On 19 April 2007 09:13, ??? wrote: > Can I have gcc 4.1.2 frontend internal documentation? I am a graduated > student and major in Computer Engineering. I need more detailed > imformation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend (C frontend) for academical reason. > The documantation includes infor

Can I have a more detailed documentation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend?

Can I have gcc 4.1.2 frontend internal documentation? I am a graduated student and major in Computer Engineering. I need more detailed imformation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend (C frontend) for academical reason. The documantation includes information about internal tree representation especially

Re: About Gcc tree tutorials

Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote: Also, I referred to some tutorials and articles in the net about writing gcc front-end. And here are they: 1. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_C_Compiler_Internals/Print_version 2. http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/GCC-Frontend-HOWTO.html (old) 3. http://www.linuxjourna

Re: About Gcc tree tutorials

Also, I referred to some tutorials and articles in the net about writing gcc front-end. And here are they: 1. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_C_Compiler_Internals/Print_version 2. http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/GCC-Frontend-HOWTO.html (old) 3. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7884 (overv

Re: About Gcc tree tutorials

Hi, From the recent mails that you have posted in the gcc mailing list I understand that you have a very few tutorials for gcc trees that are complete(at least in your opinion). It would be very helpful of you if you can get me the details of those tutorials. I get advantage from the GCC inte

RE: Documentation about gcc

On 02 October 2006 09:11, Come Lonfils wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know where I can have documentation for developer who begin with gcc. > I want to know how work exactly gcc inside. > Do you know some books or web documents which can help me? > > I need general documentation and more specially on h

Re: Documentation about gcc

On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Come Lonfils wrote: Do you know where I can have documentation for developer who begin with gcc. The standard answer works: google("gcc documentation") It is usually faster for you to ask google (i've never see it take longer than around 500 ms to answer any q

Documentation about gcc

Hi, Do you know where I can have documentation for developer who begin with gcc. I want to know how work exactly gcc inside. Do you know some books or web documents which can help me? I need general documentation and more specially on how gcc compile objective-c and objective-c++. And Also about

Documentation about gcc

Hi, Do you know where I can have documentation for developer who begin with gcc. I want to know how work exactly gcc inside. Do you know some books or web documents which can help me? I need general documentation and more specially on how gcc compile objective-c and objective-c++. And Also about

Re: About gcc

On 20/06/06, Roberto COSTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Manuel, three people may have given witty replies... isn't a smile worth that? I'm also new to the list, and I respect it as a place for meaningful discussions. At the same time, I'm not against any genuine and spontaneous humour that ma

Re: About gcc

Hello Manuel, three people may have given witty replies... isn't a smile worth that? I'm also new to the list, and I respect it as a place for meaningful discussions. At the same time, I'm not against any genuine and spontaneous humour that may arise from time to time among such serious matters

Re: About gcc

(I am new in the list, so I understand that my opinion should not be taken as seriously as others.) Three persons have already given witty replies. I think most of us got the point with the first one. Is it necessary to spend more time reading emails about this? If you want to give some reply or

RE: About gcc

On 20 June 2006 10:08, Gunnar Sjoo wrote: > According to your proposal, I hereby send my comments referring to your web > pages about downloading gcc. To me, your instructions are absolutely > impossible to understand, they could not be more impossible to understand if > they were written in Hebro

Re: About gcc

Gunnar Sjoo wrote: According to your proposal, I hereby send my comments referring to your web pages about downloading gcc. To me, your instructions are absolutely impossible to understand, they could not be more impossible to understand if they were written in Hebroe or Mandarin. I will

Re: About gcc

Gunnar Sjoo wrote: Better to learn something easier, like solving Einstein's general field equations. If that is *really* the case, then probably you should now waste time on gcc and instead try yourself on quantum gravity or string theory ;) ;) Paolo.

About gcc

According to your proposal, I hereby send my comments referring to your web pages about downloading gcc. To me, your instructions are absolutely impossible to understand, they could not be more impossible to understand if they were written in Hebroe or Mandarin. I will not recommend you t

Re: Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI

On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 09:29:08AM +0800, Fengwei Yin wrote: > Hi Richard, > Thanks for your information. I will ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, great. > But I still have question about gcc here: Um, you're still here? Please don't ask more questions here. Your questi

Re: Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI

Hi Richard, Thanks for your information. I will ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I still have question about gcc here: The Local variables layout will impact my development. Consider following C code: my_test() { int i; int j; char c[7]; int *tmp; tmp = (int

Re: Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 07:58, Fengwei Yin wrote: > int my_temp(void) > { > int i; > int j; > char str[2]; > > Please notice the address of the str and j. there IS NO memory hole > between therm > when using gcc 3.4.3 and there IS memory hole when using gcc 4.1. My question > is:

Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI

Hi, When enable the gcc 4.1 with EABI support for ARM, I met such situation about the alignment. Here is my test case: #include #include struct test { char c1; long long n; char c2; }; int my_temp(void) { int i; int j; char str[2]; lon

Re: Question about gcc-lib and building on SPARC

On 12 April 2006 22:18, Mark Cuss wrote: The guy who was here before me set up the previous version (gcc-3.3.3) gcc 3.3.3 was compiled with the following configure flags: configure --with-gnu-as --with-as=/cdl/apps/bin/sun/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/cdl/apps/bin/sun/ld --enable-lang

RE: Question about gcc-lib and building on SPARC

On 12 April 2006 22:18, Mark Cuss wrote: > The > guy who was here before me set up the previous version (gcc-3.3.3) > gcc 3.3.3 was compiled with the following configure flags: > configure --with-gnu-as --with-as=/cdl/apps/bin/sun/as --with-gnu-ld > --with-ld=/cdl/apps/bin/sun/ld --enable-lan

Re: Question about gcc-lib and building on SPARC

On 4/13/06, Mark Cuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello - this is definitely a newbie question, so bear with me... > > We've been using gcc under Solaris on SPARC hardware for some time now. The > guy who was here before me set up the previous version (gcc-3.3.3) and now > I'm trying to get gcc-3

Question about gcc-lib and building on SPARC

Hello - this is definitely a newbie question, so bear with me... We've been using gcc under Solaris on SPARC hardware for some time now. The guy who was here before me set up the previous version (gcc-3.3.3) and now I'm trying to get gcc-3.4.4 to build. In the old gcc-3.3.3 install tree, I h

Re: question about gcc

From: "Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Albrecht wrote: > > Is there some reason gcc hasn't been or can't be enhanced to provide output > > for > > cross-referencing programs? > > FYI, there are a number of tools available for producing > cross-referencing info. See for instance > htt

Re: question about gcc

Paul Albrecht wrote: Is there some reason gcc hasn't been or can't be enhanced to provide output for a cross-referencing programs? FYI, there are a number of tools available for producing cross-referencing info. See for instance http://www.gnu.org/software/global/links.html and try look

Re: question about gcc

From: "Robert Dewar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Albrecht wrote: > > Is there some reason gcc hasn't been or can't be enhanced to provide output > > for a > > cross-referencing programs? > > > > No reason why it can't be, and the reason it hasn't is that no one has done > it. Actually strictly yo

Re: question about gcc

Paul Albrecht wrote: Is there some reason gcc hasn't been or can't be enhanced to provide output for a cross-referencing programs? Paul Albrecht No reason why it can't be, and the reason it hasn't is that no one has done it. Actually strictly you don't mean gcc here, you are referring to part

question about gcc

Is there some reason gcc hasn't been or can't be enhanced to provide output for a cross-referencing programs? Paul Albrecht

Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3

zouqiong kirjoitti: .../../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc --target=mipsel-linux --enable-languages=c --disable-checking -enable-shared -v; This is not true at all -B=/opt/gcc-2.95//mipsel-linux/bin/ -I=/opt/gcc-2.95//mipsel-linux/include Because these rows tell that a '--pre

Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3

Steven J. Hill kirjoitti: zouqiong wrote in 15.4.2005 10:16: > i download the release version of gcc-2.95.3, and binutils 2.15, > then i did the following things: > 1. mkdir binutils-build; > .../../binutils-2.15/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc > --target=mipsel-linux -v; > make;make install; > >

Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3

zouqiong wrote: i am surprised about it. You seem surprised, and I am terrified you are using a compiler that old. Please go look at: http://kegel.com/crosstool/ which automatically builds cross toolchains and even still has scripts to build your ancient (IMHO) combination. -Steve

some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3

i download the release version of gcc-2.95.3, and binutils 2.15, then i did the following things: 1. mkdir binutils-build; ../../binutils-2.15/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc --target=mipsel-linux -v; make;make install; 2.i copy the o32 lib, o32 include to the /opt/gcc/mipsel-linux/lib, /opt/gcc/mip

Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327

zouq wrote: > /home/cpu/source/gcc-4.1-20050327/gcc/config/mips/mips.c:3976: error: > structure has no member named `truthvalue_conversion' This is the info we needed. Looking at the ChangeLog file, I see that this was accidentally broken by Joseph Myers last week. I posted a followup to the pa

Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327

- 源邮件 - 主题: Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 发件人: "zouq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 日期: Tue, 三月 29, 2005 8:21 am 收件人: "James E Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327

zouq wrote: > i build a crosscompiler for gcc, abi=n32 gcc-4.1-20050327/configure > -target=mips64el-linux -prefix=/opt/gcc-4.1-20050327/ > -enable-languages=c --disable-shared make it will error with > config/mips/mips.c We need more info than what you have provided. In particular, we need to kn

about gcc-4.1-20050327

i build a crosscompiler for gcc, abi=n32 gcc-4.1-20050327/configure -target=mips64el-linux -prefix=/opt/gcc-4.1-20050327/ -enable-languages=c --disable-shared make it will error with config/mips/mips.c

Re: about gcc -XLinker -M

On Feb 26, 2005, at 8:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gcc -XLinker -M test.c 2>test.map would output some usful information about locating function to lib and ... The detail analyze of them would be very useful. Where can I find some introduce document about them? This list isn't for such questions

about gcc -XLinker -M

Hi, gcc -XLinker -M test.c 2>test.map would output some usful information about locating function to lib and ... The detail analyze of them would be very useful. Where can I find some introduce document about them? Thanks in advance. gan __ Do

Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)

Thanks for clearing up my mis-understanding ! --- Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 22, 2005, at 4:29 PM, Vasanth wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am sure this bug has been reported before, but I > am > > not able to track it down in bugzilla. Someone > kindly > > refer me to the r

Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)

On Feb 22, 2005, at 4:29 PM, Vasanth wrote: Hi, I am sure this bug has been reported before, but I am not able to track it down in bugzilla. Someone kindly refer me to the relevant bug report. You are violating C90/C99 aliasing rules. --Pinski

Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)

Hi, I am sure this bug has been reported before, but I am not able to track it down in bugzilla. Someone kindly refer me to the relevant bug report. -- Bug in -O2 level with following code construct, #define FTYPE float FTYPE fir_basic (FTYPE input, int ntaps, FTYPE h[], FTYPE z[]); for (ii =