Hi!
On 5/25/20 2:56 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
>> AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki
>> page, and as the AVR ISA does not have non-condition-code
>> clobbering arithmetic instructions, conclud
Hello!
> I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
> AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki
> page, and as the AVR ISA does not have non-condition-code
> clobbering arithmetic instructions, concluded that I'd have to
> follow the steps outlined for ca
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I very much disagree with this. I think my approach was possibly the
> > only viable one, and definitely the most sensible one for this target.
> > Not only is there nothing meaningful to be gained from separating cc
> > setters and users on m68k given
> I very much disagree with this. I think my approach was possibly the
> only viable one, and definitely the most sensible one for this target.
> Not only is there nothing meaningful to be gained from separating cc
> setters and users on m68k given that almost all instructions (including
> moves) c
On 4/23/20 8:31 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Thanks, I will take a look at Bernd's work. IIRC, he took a
different approach from what was suggested in the wiki, right?
Yes, let's say that it's a half-baked conversion, probably a consequence of
the bounty. This might be good enough, depending on th
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 07:41 +0530, Senthil Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:08 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:01 +0530, Senthil Kumar via Gcc wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
> > > AVR port in my spare time. I'v
> On Apr 22, 2020, at 10:11 PM, Senthil Kumar via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:08 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:01 +0530, Senthil Kumar via Gcc wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
>>> AVR port in my spare tim
> Thanks, I will take a look at Bernd's work. IIRC, he took a
> different approach from what was suggested in the wiki, right?
Yes, let's say that it's a half-baked conversion, probably a consequence of
the bounty. This might be good enough, depending on the architecture.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:37 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:53 PM Moritz Strübe
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Am 22.04.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jeff Law via Gcc:
> > > [..] as the
> > > alternative would be dropping the AVR port.
> >
> > Shouldn't that work be sponsored by Microchip (o
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:08 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:01 +0530, Senthil Kumar via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
> > AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki
> > page, and as the AVR ISA does
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:53 PM Moritz Strübe
wrote:
>
> Am 22.04.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jeff Law via Gcc:
> > [..] as the
> > alternative would be dropping the AVR port.
>
> Shouldn't that work be sponsored by Microchip (or whoever currently owns
> AVR)? Arduino Inc. might also be highly interes
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 19:52 +0200, Moritz Strübe wrote:
> Am 22.04.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jeff Law via Gcc:
> > [..] as the
> > alternative would be dropping the AVR port.
>
> Shouldn't that work be sponsored by Microchip (or whoever currently owns
> AVR)? Arduino Inc. might also be highly interes
Am 22.04.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jeff Law via Gcc:
[..] as the
alternative would be dropping the AVR port.
Shouldn't that work be sponsored by Microchip (or whoever currently owns
AVR)? Arduino Inc. might also be highly interested in continued
AVR-support.
Cheers
Morty
--
Redheads Ltd. Sof
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:01 +0530, Senthil Kumar via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
> AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki
> page, and as the AVR ISA does not have non-condition-code
> clobbering arithmetic instructio
Hi,
I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the
AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki
page, and as the AVR ISA does not have non-condition-code
clobbering arithmetic instructions, concluded that I'd have to
follow the steps outlined for case #2.
Are t
15 matches
Mail list logo
