On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 01:19:35PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Another way to solve the problem would be to have
> some way to make gcc emit the symbol, perhaps by
> an attribute that declares the address.
Just make it a longcall symbol. Either define it to be at
0x2718|1 in the linker scr
On Sunday 23 March 2008, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This list is for development of gcc, not gcc users. In future gcc-help,
> > or some other arm specific list is the correct place to ask such
> > questions.
>
> I guess it wasn
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This list is for development of gcc, not gcc users. In future gcc-help, or
> some other arm specific list is the correct place to ask such questions.
I guess it wasn't clear that I'm requesting a new attribute.
I want to for
This list is for development of gcc, not gcc users. In future gcc-help, or
some other arm specific list is the correct place to ask such questions.
> As far as I can tell, there is no way to declare
> that a particular function pointer will point at
> plain ARM code or at Thumb code. I'm more
> t
As far as I can tell, there is no way to declare
that a particular function pointer will point at
plain ARM code or at Thumb code. I'm more
than a little surprised actually, so maybe I just
missed something. How can I do this?
Some background: The function is in ROM.
I'm using a linker script to g
