10 Apr 2007 10:53:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As far as I can tell, you are recommending that gcc generate a
different code sequence than it currently does. The most helpful
approach you can use for such a suggestion is to open a bug report
marked as an enhancement. Se
"J.C. Pizarro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /* Given X an unsigned of 32 bits, and Y a bool. Try to translate optimizing
> *
> * Y = X > 2147483647; to Y = ((signed)X) < 0;
> * Y = X >= 2147483648; to Y = ((signed)X) < 0;
> *
> * [ Another optimization is to Y = (X >> 31) ]
As far
I'm sorry, i did want to say 2 billions, not 2 millions.
J.C. Pizarro
/* Given X an unsigned of 32 bits, and Y a bool. Try to translate optimizing
*
* Y = X > 2147483647; to Y = ((signed)X) < 0;
* Y = X >= 2147483648; to Y = ((signed)X) < 0;
*
* [ Another optimization is to Y = (X >> 31) ]
*
* The opposite (ELSE):
*
* Y = X <= 2147483647; to Y = ((signe
