"Rodney M. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, Thanks for the information. Just in case, does anybody already
> have it in their head roughly where in gcc code this decision is made?
tree-nested.c
Ian
OK, Thanks for the information. Just in case, does anybody already
have it in their head roughly where in gcc code this decision is made?
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Rodney M. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
When executing in foo, the frame pointer will point to a fixed spot in the
activatio
"Rodney M. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When executing in foo, the frame pointer will point to a fixed spot in the
> activation record of foo. On i386, the FP is %ebx and it points to the
> dynamic link field. From there, loc is at displacement -4. Code in the
> body of foo will referen
This is repost of my slightly earlier post, with a critical and
confusing misstatement corrected.
Well, I agree with what you said about your example, but it's not what
I am meaning. See below.
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Rodney M. Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I don't understand this.
