> Yes; in fact 'main' is even superfluous. Just compile
>
> int var;
>
> with -S -O2 -g on gcc 3.4 and 4.0 and look at the resulting
> assembler file, the difference is quite obvious ...
Maybe this is responsible for part of PR21828?
Paolo
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:13:19PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > You can reproduce it using:
> > static int i;
> > int main(void)
> > {
> >i += 3;
> >i *= 5;
> >return 0;
> > }
> >
> > and readelf and looking for the DW_TAG_variable tag.
>
> Yes; in fact '
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> You can reproduce it using:
> static int i;
> int main(void)
> {
>i += 3;
>i *= 5;
>return 0;
> }
>
> and readelf and looking for the DW_TAG_variable tag.
Yes; in fact 'main' is even superfluous. Just compile
int var;
with -S -O2 -g on gcc 3.4 and 4.0 and
On May 30, 2005, at 3:14 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On May 30, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Hello,
we've just noticed a quite serious regression in debug info output
in GCC 4.0 over previous releases: when building with -funit-at-a-time
(which is on by default with -O2), *no* debug
On May 30, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Hello,
we've just noticed a quite serious regression in debug info output
in GCC 4.0 over previous releases: when building with -funit-at-a-time
(which is on by default with -O2), *no* debug info for global variables
appears to be emitted at a
Hello,
we've just noticed a quite serious regression in debug info output
in GCC 4.0 over previous releases: when building with -funit-at-a-time
(which is on by default with -O2), *no* debug info for global variables
appears to be emitted at all.
The problem appears to be this piece of code in ch
