Re: -pg problem

can someone help me understand what is going on? are the -p and -pg options supposed to work? This question is not appropriate for gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is a mailing list for gcc developments. It is appropriate for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I apologize for this. -p does work on

Re: -pg problem

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Adam Sulmicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: can someone help me understand what is going on? are the -p and -pg options supposed to work? This question is not appropriate for gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is a mailing list for gcc develop

Re: -pg problem

Adam Sulmicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can someone help me understand what is going on? > > are the -p and -pg options supposed to work? This question is not appropriate for gcc@gcc.gnu.org, which is a mailing list for gcc developments. It is appropriate for [EMAIL PROTEC

-pg problem

hello, can someone help me understand what is going on? are the -p and -pg options supposed to work? # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandi