orting any kind of "common" at all - or at the very
> least, make "-fno-common" the default.
>
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85678>
>
> (That is just my opinion, of course.)
>
> mvh.,
>
> David
>
>
> On 29/01/2
any kind of "common" at all - or at the very
least, make "-fno-common" the default.
<https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85678>
(That is just my opinion, of course.)
mvh.,
David
On 29/01/2019 11:09, Bernhard Schommer wrote:
Thanks for the fast answer, sor
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Bernhard Schommer wrote:
> Thanks for the fast answer, sorry if I posted this on the wrong list.
> Actually I was looking at this not due to changes in my code but
> rather to implement the option for another compiler and I wanted to
> mimic the behavior of
., 29. Jan. 2019 um 10:54 Uhr schrieb David Brown :
>
> On 28/01/2019 16:58, Bernhard Schommer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to know if the handling of the option -fno-common has
> > changed between version 7.3 and 8.2 for x86. I tried it with the
> > defaul
On 28/01/2019 16:58, Bernhard Schommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if the handling of the option -fno-common has
> changed between version 7.3 and 8.2 for x86. I tried it with the
> default system version of OpenSUSE and for example:
>
> const int i;
>
> is
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:59 PM Bernhard Schommer
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if the handling of the option -fno-common has
> changed between version 7.3 and 8.2 for x86. I tried it with the
> default system version of OpenSUSE and for example:
>
> const int
> On 28 Jan 2019, at 15:58, Bernhard Schommer
> wrote:
>
> I would like to know if the handling of the option -fno-common has
> changed between version 7.3 and 8.2 for x86. I tried it with the
> default system version of OpenSUSE and for example:
>
> const int i;
&g
Hi,
I would like to know if the handling of the option -fno-common has
changed between version 7.3 and 8.2 for x86. I tried it with the
default system version of OpenSUSE and for example:
const int i;
is placed in the .bss section. With a newer self-compiled version 8.2
the same variable is
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Is the manual wording just slightly vague here, and both .data and .bss
> are regarded as covered by the phrase "the data section of the object file"?
Yes.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
According to the manual,
--snip--
`-fno-common'
In C, allocate even uninitialized global variables in the data
section of the object file, rather than generating them as common
blocks.
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
