> On Mar 20, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) wrote:
>
> > infringes our copyright
>
> > Patent law
>
> Please be careful to not spread the confusion that already exists
> between these unrelated laws.
Sorry: if I said "patent" anywhere in my message it was a typo for
"copyright". Opps
On Mar 20, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) wrote:
> infringes our copyright
> Patent law
Please be careful to not spread the confusion that already exists
between these unrelated laws.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member
> Different people will give you different answers about different
> situations. There is no clear answer. This mailing list is
> unfortunately not the right place to ask GPL licensing questions.
>
> I would suggest the gnu.misc.discuss newsgroup. Or asking the Free
> Software Foundation direct
"Nick Rolins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I make a program that calls by command line the gcc executable with
> -fdump-translation-unit option and parses the dump output file,
> does it have to adhere to the GPL license ?
>
> If it doesn't have to adhere to the GPL license, how about if my
>
Hi,
If I make a program that calls by command line the gcc executable with
-fdump-translation-unit option and parses the dump output file,
does it have to adhere to the GPL license ?
If it doesn't have to adhere to the GPL license, how about if my
program gets the dump output by a pipe or a sock
