James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > -Wstrict-aliasing=2. It warns about more possible problems than
> > -Wstrict-aliasing, but it does not warn about all possible problems.
>
> This is the important point that I was trying to get across, though I
> do see tha
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
-Wstrict-aliasing=2. It warns about more possible problems than
-Wstrict-aliasing, but it does not warn about all possible problems.
This is the important point that I was trying to get across, though I do
see that using "all" can be misconstrued here. How about somet
Hi Jim, the documentation for -Wstrict-aliasing=2 says:
It warns about all code which might break the strict aliasing
rules that the compiler is using for optimization. This warning
catches all cases, but it will also give a warning for some
ambiguous cases that are safe.
However
