On 6/2/06, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mind to send/commit a patch to complete releases.html with 4.x
releases and add a step to releasing.html? (Basically you just
need to revert revision 1.26 of that file.)
Joe Buck beat me to it and you applied it for him. Thanks to
both of y
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Joe Buck wrote:
> Let's just add the info to the table. Here is a proposed patch.
> Note that I resorted by date and added an explanation. I think
> that the attempt to sort by release number became increasingly
> untenable after 3.4, because we now have heavy overlapping. Be
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:43:09PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> In the eyes of at least some, especially the dates for the old
> releases in releases.html are of historical interest, so I'd be
> quite hesitant to remove these.
>
> I'm not sure I agree that it is easy to miss the statement on
>
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> Dave Yost points out that a cursory look at the main table
> in:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
>
> (which is linked-to from the main page) gives the impression
> that 3.4.6 has been our last release. It is very easy to
> miss the fine-print-l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Dave Yost points out that a cursory look at the main table
in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
(which is linked-to from the main page) gives the impression
that 3.4.6 has been our last release. It is very easy to
miss the fine-print-like
