Richard Sandiford wrote:
>Kenneth Zadeck writes:
>> I am a little confused here.what is the reason for doing the the
>> is_sign_extended thing?
>> is the point of deferring the canonization that we can avoid the use
>of
>> the scratch array until the value is actually used. then we
>> ca
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
> I am a little confused here.what is the reason for doing the the
> is_sign_extended thing?
> is the point of deferring the canonization that we can avoid the use of
> the scratch array until the value is actually used. then we
> canonicalize on demand?
The idea i
Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>I am a little confused here.what is the reason for doing the the
>is_sign_extended thing?
>is the point of deferring the canonization that we can avoid the use of
>
>the scratch array until the value is actually used. then we
>canonicalize on demand?
Yes.
>That see
I am a little confused here.what is the reason for doing the the
is_sign_extended thing?
is the point of deferring the canonization that we can avoid the use of
the scratch array until the value is actually used. then we
canonicalize on demand?
That seems like it is going to require seve
