On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Is this ok?
Yup, looks good, and falls under the obvious rule for web pages ;-).
I was going to suggest to sort this in alphabetically, but currently
there is not apparent sort order at all; perhaps I'll have a look after
I see your patch go in, certai
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 08:03 -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Can you make sure you update svn.html for the new branch?
>
> Sure can!
>
> Is this ok?
Yes and it is obvious as it is part of the creating the branch process.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
> Can you make sure you update svn.html for the new branch?
Sure can!
Is this ok?
Index: svn.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.36 svn.html
--- svn.html11 Sep 2006 18:59:51
> I think this patch may have fried your brain slightly:
>
> (get_modify_stmt_operands): Rename from get_modify_stmt_operands.
Definitely! Good catch. Fixed.
On 9/6/06, Aldy Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks.
I've created the gimple-tuples-branch. It is mainline as of Friday, plus
my patches ported to it. The branch is in severely broken mode, as it's
a work in progress. Merging into mainline just brought a whole new set of
bugs :).
> Hi folks.
>
> I've created the gimple-tuples-branch. It is mainline as of Friday, plus
> my patches ported to it. The branch is in severely broken mode, as it's
> a work in progress. Merging into mainline just brought a whole new set of
> bugs :).
Can you make sure you update svn.html for th
