Re: [PATCH, rs6000] -mno-sched-prolog vs .debug_frame

2011-07-08 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 07/05/2011 04:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >>> The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with >>> some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated. >>>

[PATCH, rs6000] -mno-sched-prolog vs .debug_frame

2011-07-08 Thread Richard Henderson
On 07/05/2011 04:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with >> some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated. >> >> Some suggested solutions are: >> >> (1) Remove the option.

Re: [rs6000] -mno-sched-prolog vs .debug_frame

2011-07-05 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with > some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated. > > Some suggested solutions are: > >  (1) Remove the option.  Is it really that interesting >     beyond -mno-sched

[rs6000] -mno-sched-prolog vs .debug_frame

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Henderson
The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated. Some suggested solutions are: (1) Remove the option. Is it really that interesting beyond -mno-sched-insns2? (2) Emit blockage insns at the end of the prologue an