[pph] Merge from trunk rev 186776.

2012-04-25 Thread Diego Novillo
I had to adjust a couple of files and a test case, but other than that, no surprises. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk

2012-03-04 Thread Diego Novillo
This merge brings PPH into 4.8. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk

2012-02-10 Thread Diego Novillo
I've merged trunk rev 183972 into the pph branch. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk rev 182919

2012-01-06 Thread Diego Novillo
No new surprises with this merge. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk

2011-12-15 Thread Diego Novillo
Merge from trunk at revision 182206. This merge is still susceptible to PR 51554, but it does not affect many builds. I'll just pick up Jason's fix in the next merge. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk rev 180687. Fix for skipped line tables

2011-11-22 Thread Diego Novillo
This merge was quite convoluted. It brought in the new macro location features which required several changes in the line table routines. With it, I fixed the bug I had introduced with the PPH skipping that left holes in the line map table. Instead of saving absolute index numbers for the includ

[pph] Merge from trunk

2011-09-21 Thread Diego Novillo
Lawrence, This merge brings the testsuite validation script. You can use it after builds with: $ cd $ /contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py It will tell you what new failures you have in the build. Tested on x86_64. Committed to branch. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk

2011-08-11 Thread Diego Novillo
This brings the second part of the streamer refactoring. I'm going to be doing frequent merges in the next little while to avoid big conflicts. Tested on x86_64. Diego.

[pph] Merge from trunk rev 177573.

2011-08-09 Thread Diego Novillo
This merge brings in Gab's trunk changes to line_map and my refactoring of the streaming code. It also allows us to use C++ for the implementation (with the same caveats we have in trunk, the code must be ifdef'd to build with both C and C++ compilers). I will continue the next phase of the strea

Re: [pph] Merge from trunk rev

2011-04-20 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Diego Novillo wrote: > This merge brings the branch up to rev 172662. > > There are some LTO failures which are ICEs induced by a new > assertion I added in bp_pack_value. We discussed this in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01115.html. > > The failure happen

[pph] Merge from trunk rev

2011-04-19 Thread Diego Novillo
This merge brings the branch up to rev 172662. There are some LTO failures which are ICEs induced by a new assertion I added in bp_pack_value. We discussed this in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01115.html. The failure happens when we try to pack DECL_OFFSET_ALIGN. We only try to

[pph] Merge from trunk r169107

2011-01-21 Thread Diego Novillo
I've merged trunk rev 169107 into the pph branch. No new failures. Lawrence, you will probably find little/no merge conflicts with your timevar patch. Diego.