Re: [plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations

2009-05-12 Thread Justin Seyster
Great! I actually got around to submitting a patch before the weekend, but Andrew Pinski noted that naming these passes results in some unwanted dump files. I plan to have a patch ready soon to fix that up. --Justin On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23,

Re: [plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations

2009-05-12 Thread Diego Novillo
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 22:58, Justin Seyster wrote: >    Unless that's not a good place to put plug-in passes, I propose > giving the pass_all_optimizations pass the name "all_optimizations." > I believe that there are a handful of other unnamed passes that might > also be useful for plug-in dev

[plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations

2009-04-23 Thread Justin Seyster
I'm working on porting a plug-in designed for the old branches/plugin branch to the (recently merged) shiny new branches/plugins branch. One thing that's turning out to be tricky is placing the plug-in transform in exactly the same place. In the old branch, plug-ins hook in just before the pa