On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> I was waiting for a gfortran maintainer to comment -- if it's fine
>> with them, it surely is fine with me.
> The patch is fine. I was going to commit it, but real life
> has taken over and gfortran is way down the list of important
> things to do.
It's
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:19:01AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Brooks Moses wrote:
> >> As per a recent conversation with Steve Kargl on the fortran list, I'm
> >> submitting this patch, which adds a small "Documentation" section to
> >> the gfortran "home page", right below
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Brooks Moses wrote:
>> As per a recent conversation with Steve Kargl on the fortran list, I'm
>> submitting this patch, which adds a small "Documentation" section to
>> the gfortran "home page", right below the "Binaries" section.
> Oh, bother. I just noticed that I failed to
Brooks Moses wrote:
As per a recent conversation with Steve Kargl on the fortran list, I'm
submitting this patch, which adds a small "Documentation" section to
the gfortran "home page", right below the "Binaries" section.
Oh, bother. I just noticed that I failed to update the link when I cut-
As per a recent conversation with Steve Kargl on the fortran list, I'm
submitting this patch, which adds a small "Documentation" section to
the gfortran "home page", right below the "Binaries" section.
I can't seem to find any examples of ChangeLog entries for wwwdocs
entries; is one needed?
- B
