On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:46, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> On 22/09/20 12:25 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> >Is there really a reason to want a nonstandard macro like this to do
> >something that's already trivial to do in the base language and has a
> >standard idiom (sizeof x / sizeof *
On 22/09/20 12:25 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
Is there really a reason to want a nonstandard macro like this to do
something that's already trivial to do in the base language and has a
standard idiom (sizeof x / sizeof *x)?
IMHO no.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:47:51PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> [[ CC += libc-coord at lists.openwall.com ]]
I missed the beginning of this so perhaps it's already been discussed,
but I don't see how cdefs.h is a remotely reasonable place for this.
cdefs.h is included by all glibc headers and
* Jonathan Wakely:
>># define array_length(arr) (std:size(arr))
>
> C++ programmers will not accept a macro for this.
I think we need a macro for C++98 support because there is no other way
to produce constant expression.
Note that this intended for C programs compiled in C++ mode. As pointe
Why would C++ programmers need this given
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/size ?
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020, 05:54 Alejandro Colomar
wrote:
> [[ CC += libc-coord at lists.openwall.com ]]
>
> On 2020-09-21 12:33, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Alejandro Colomar:
> >
> >> [[
> >> CC += libc-coor
