On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> [Now using the text suggested by David.]
>
> Probably no one uses these old processors anymore, and support for
> them is getting in the way of other work in the rs6000 port.
Well, if this is the text that David suggested, I say go ahead and commit.
[Now using the text suggested by David.]
Probably no one uses these old processors anymore, and support for them
is getting in the way of other work in the rs6000 port.
Let's remove it in 4.6. Okay?
Segher
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.90
diff
> Please make another attempt at the language of the statement without
> editorializing about the name of the port.
Sorry about that. Like this?
Segher
diff -u -p -r1.90 changes.html
--- changes.html27 Apr 2010 13:53:21 - 1.90
+++ changes.html28 May 2010 04:09:20 -000
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Probably no one uses these old processors anymore, and support for them
> is getting in the way of other work in the rs6000 port.
>
> Let's remove it in 4.6. Okay?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.htm
Probably no one uses these old processors anymore, and support for them
is getting in the way of other work in the rs6000 port.
Let's remove it in 4.6. Okay?
Segher
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -r1.90 changes.html
--- changes.html
