> Paolo,
>
> bootstrap finished OK on alpha, regression test results are at [1].
> There are unrelated errors with "random" libc++ tests and HJ's PR39323
> testcase. Do not mind the timeouts.
Great -- my testsuite comparison also finished with not a single
difference, which is good.
Paolo
Uros Bizjak wrote:
I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
targets -- arm, alpha, ia64, pa, s390, x86_64.
I can bootstrap on Comp
> I am seeing a few regressions with respect to trunk of a recent vintage.
Thanks, they are not there on arm-elf but I could indeed reproduce them
with arm-linux-gnueabi. Here is a patch which I am committing to
cond-optab branch.
Paolo
2009-04-09 Paolo Bonzini
* optabs.c (prepare_c
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Fixed like this:
>
> Index: gcc/optabs.c
> ===
> --- gcc/optabs.c(branch cond-optab)
> +++ gcc/optabs.c(working copy)
> @@ -4026,6 +4026,8 @@ prepare_cmp_insn (rtx x, rt
b] svn branch created, looking for reviews for
> the "cleanup" parts
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
> >> To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
> >> targets -- arm, alpha, ia64, pa, s390, x8
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
>
> Note this patch is unrelated and only affects sync.md patterns.
>
>> The cond-optab branch (rev. 145751) fails to bootstrap on s390x:
>>
>> /build2/gcc-condoptab
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
>
> Note this patch is unrelated and only affects sync.md patterns.
>
>> The cond-optab branch (rev. 145751) fails to bootstrap on s390x:
>>
>> /build2/gcc-condoptab
Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
Note this patch is unrelated and only affects sync.md patterns.
> The cond-optab branch (rev. 145751) fails to bootstrap on s390x:
>
> /build2/gcc-condoptab/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In func
Hi,
> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
The cond-optab branch (rev. 145751) fails to bootstrap on s390x:
/build2/gcc-condoptab/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__fixunsdfti':
/build2/gcc-condoptab/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1266: internal compiler error: i
>> r145655: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00492.html (testsuite)
>
> What's the point of the compile-only tests? It would be much more
> useful to have tests that execute and check that the results are
> correct for a variety of input values.
That's true. I went for compile-only
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
>> To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
>> targets -- arm, alpha, ia64, pa, s390, x86_64.
>
> I'm bootstrapping the branch on an arm-linux-gnueabi target.
bootstrap on arm-linux-gnueabi completed. Regress
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Thanks, this leaves out:
>
> r145593: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (i386)
> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
> r145597, r145598, r145599:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> > I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
>> > cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
>>
>> > To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
>> > targets -- arm, alpha, ia
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The following patches can be transported to mainline independent of the
> completion of the project. I would like to merge these patches one at a
> time, so reviews for these are welcome now.
>
> r145593: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:37 +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
> > cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
>
> > To aid testing, I'd like people to help boots
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
> cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
> To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
> targets -- arm, alpha, ia64, pa, s390, x
Thanks, this leaves out:
r145593: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (i386)
r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
r145597, r145598, r145599:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00947.html (gen*)
r145603: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
>> r145601: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01215.html (RTL)
>
> This is also ok.
Thanks, I won't commit this until the final merge though because I
cannot really test it separately.
Paolo
> To aid testing, I'd like people to help bootstrapping bootstrappable
> targets -- arm, alpha, ia64, pa, s390, x86_64.
I'm bootstrapping the branch on an arm-linux-gnueabi target.
Ramana
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
> cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
>
> The branch was bootstrapped i686-pc-linux-gnu and is identical to the
> tree that Kaz bootstrapped on sh4-linux
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
> cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
>
> The branch was bootstrapped i686-pc-linux-gnu and is identical to the
> tree that Kaz bootstrapped on sh4-linux
I created the cond-optab svn branch and finished committing the
cond-optab patches to it. I also documented it in svn.html.
The branch was bootstrapped i686-pc-linux-gnu and is identical to the
tree that Kaz bootstrapped on sh4-linux.
The rest of this message details the plans for merging and fu
22 matches
Mail list logo
