On Fri, 22 Nov 2024, Sam James wrote:
> > Some estimate of the build failure would also be helpful. Is it the
> > same as, e.g. the GCC 12 to GCC 13 update, or is it igher?
>
> It's pretty large so far. Between 12 and 13, the main issues were:
> libstdc++ transitive include changes and a small n
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Sam James:
>
>>> Has anyone performed experiments to determine the impact of this change
>>> on typical free software distributions?
>>
>> I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117298 for an issue Joseph noticed in one
>> of the GCC tests (that is actually an improvement, but a
* Joseph Myers:
> Change the default language version for C compilation from -std=gnu17
> to -std=gnu23. A few tests are updated to remove local definitions of
> bool, true and false (where making such an unconditional test change
> seemed to make more sense than changing the test conditionally e
* Sam James:
>> Has anyone performed experiments to determine the impact of this change
>> on typical free software distributions?
>
> I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR117298 for an issue Joseph noticed in one
> of the GCC tests (that is actually an improvement, but a missed opt for
> older standards
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Joseph Myers:
>
>> Change the default language version for C compilation from -std=gnu17
>> to -std=gnu23. A few tests are updated to remove local definitions of
>> bool, true and false (where making such an unconditional test change
>> seemed to make more sense than c
