Re: [c++0x] DR 387 implementation in incomplete.

2009-03-10 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, > Is somebody on this, or should I file a PR? > I'll fix it, thanks for your report. Paolo. PS: in the future remember to also CC libstdc++, to be sure.

[c++0x] DR 387 implementation in incomplete.

2009-03-10 Thread Jan van Dijk
Hello, It seems that the implementation of DR 387 in trunk's is incomplete: both versions of operator+,-(const _Tp&) still assume real() is an lvalue (see below). These are the only offenders , AFAICS. Is somebody on this, or should I file a PR? Regards, Jan. The program: #in