Re: [Repost] RFC: dump gengtype structures

2009-08-21 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Laurynas Biveinis writes: > [Third try. Apparently the compressed dump was still too big to get through] > > So I got fed up with trying to navigate gengtype maze of type_p, > pair_p and others and trying to figure out the difference between > GC_POINTED_TO and GC_USED and what is so "maybe" abou

[Repost] RFC: dump gengtype structures

2009-08-20 Thread Laurynas Biveinis
[Third try. Apparently the compressed dump was still too big to get through] So I got fed up with trying to navigate gengtype maze of type_p, pair_p and others and trying to figure out the difference between GC_POINTED_TO and GC_USED and what is so "maybe" about GC_MAYBE_POINTED_TO, thus I extende