On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> > It turned out to be much easier than I thought to decipher the top level
> > machinery and get GMP/MPFR building inside the GCC tree. :-)
>
> Some thoughts, if this configures and builds most (all?) of t
On Oct 8, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
It turned out to be much easier than I thought to decipher the top
level
machinery and get GMP/MPFR building inside the GCC tree. :-)
Some thoughts, if this configures and builds most (all?) of the time,
then we are changing the portability
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 04:42:29PM -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
>
> 3. Assuming we're merciless in requiring an up-to-date version of
> GMP/MPFR in #2, remove hacks in fortran that work around bugs in older
> copies of GMP/MPFR. We can also do this separately after everything
> settles down. Ca
It turned out to be much easier than I thought to decipher the top level
machinery and get GMP/MPFR building inside the GCC tree. :-)
The patch below is sufficient to build both GMP and MPFR and use them when
linking cc1. When I add in my previous patch for PR 29335 to evaluate
sin/cos/tan at co
