2009/6/11 Aldy Hernandez:
>
> In the meantime, can you just put the column number in the dg-error
> message? i.e:
>
> // { dg-error "XX:no match" }
>
> This will match the message correctly, and eventually all error messages
> should have matching columns.
That works great, thanks, Aldy.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:09:48PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Jonathan Wakely:
> > 2009/6/5 Aldy Hernandez:
> >>
> >> Which test is this? ?Can you send it to me?
> >
> > It tests a header that isn't checked in yet, so sending the test alone
> > wouldn't help much :)
> >
> > I'll try t
2009/6/5 Jonathan Wakely:
> 2009/6/5 Aldy Hernandez:
>>
>> Which test is this? Can you send it to me?
>
> It tests a header that isn't checked in yet, so sending the test alone
> wouldn't help much :)
>
> I'll try to come up with a self-contained example tomorrow.
The attached test will FAIL with
2009/6/5 Aldy Hernandez:
>
> Which test is this? Can you send it to me?
It tests a header that isn't checked in yet, so sending the test alone
wouldn't help much :)
I'll try to come up with a self-contained example tomorrow.
Jonathan
2009/6/5 Janis Johnson:
>
> I think the libstdc++ testsuite doesn't use the overrides for dg-error
> and friends and so isn't handling the column numbers in the new way.
> I'll take a look, but it might be awhile before I get to it.
Thanks, Janis. I have added -fno-show-column to
libstdc++-v3/scri
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:37 -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:09:57AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > 2009/5/20 Aldy Hernandez:
> > >>
> > >> My only worry is that the testsuite may confuse column and line
> > >> numbers and pass/fail tests because of it.
> > >
> > > Janis
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:09:57AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Aldy Hernandez:
> >>
> >> My only worry is that the testsuite may confuse column and line
> >> numbers and pass/fail tests because of it.
> >
> > Janis has a patch for the testsuite to handle all this.
>
> I'm seeing exac
2009/5/20 Aldy Hernandez:
>>
>> My only worry is that the testsuite may confuse column and line
>> numbers and pass/fail tests because of it.
>
> Janis has a patch for the testsuite to handle all this.
I'm seeing exactly this in the libstdc++ testsuite with some new tests
I've written - is a fix o
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 04:39:00PM +0200, Manuel L?pez-Ib??ez wrote:
> 2009/5/20 Aldy Hernandez :
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > Before I merge the diagnostics branch I'd like to enable it on the
> > testsuite to get us all in the habit of at least being aware of columns.
> >
> > Joseph Myers suggested enab
> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor writes:
Ian> If you haven't already done so, please check that the emacs next-error
Ian> function is not affected by this.
This definitely works.
Tom
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> When we have good caret diagnostics it would also be nice to enable them
> by default. However, that is a much bigger change. Does anybody have
> an opinion on that?
Yes, that tripling the size of output in a cascade of diagnostics is a bad
idea.
2009/5/20 Ian Lance Taylor :
> When we have good caret diagnostics it would also be nice to enable them
> by default. However, that is a much bigger change. Does anybody have
> an opinion on that?
Why don't have that discussion when (and if) caret diagnostics are
available? I don't think anyone
Aldy Hernandez writes:
> Before I merge the diagnostics branch I'd like to enable it on the
> testsuite to get us all in the habit of at least being aware of columns.
>
> Joseph Myers suggested enabling it in the compiler instead of the
> testsuite. Are there any big objections to this?
I agree
2009/5/20 Aldy Hernandez :
> Hi folks.
>
> Before I merge the diagnostics branch I'd like to enable it on the
> testsuite to get us all in the habit of at least being aware of columns.
>
> Joseph Myers suggested enabling it in the compiler instead of the
> testsuite. Are there any big objections t
Hi folks.
Before I merge the diagnostics branch I'd like to enable it on the
testsuite to get us all in the habit of at least being aware of columns.
Joseph Myers suggested enabling it in the compiler instead of the
testsuite. Are there any big objections to this?
Aldy
15 matches
Mail list logo
