On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 16:57 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> The checker reaches region-model.cc#3083 in my patch with the
> impl_region_model_context
> on the 'after' node of create_buffer() but then discards the warning
> inside
> impl_region_model_context::warn because m_stmt is null. Even if m_stmt
The checker reaches region-model.cc#3083 in my patch with the
impl_region_model_context
on the 'after' node of create_buffer() but then discards the warning inside
impl_region_model_context::warn because m_stmt is null. Even if m_stmt were
not be NULL at the 'after' node, my warning would be emit
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 22:00 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> On Sat Jun 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM CEST, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 22:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
>
On Sat Jun 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM CEST, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 22:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > >
> >
> > I have resent the patch us
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 22:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
[...snip...]
> >
>
> I have resent the patch using git send-email as a reply to my original
> message.
> The new message
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 21:23 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
>
>
> On Fr, Jun 17 2022 at 22:45:42 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 21:25, Tim Lange wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > Hi Tim,
> > Thanks for posting the POC patch!
> > Just a couple of comments (inline)
>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:48:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi Tim.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Various comments inline below, throughout...
>
> >
> > tracked in PR105900 [0], I'd like to add support for a new warn
On Fr, Jun 17 2022 at 22:45:42 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 21:25, Tim Lange wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi Tim,
Thanks for posting the POC patch!
Just a couple of comments (inline)
Hi Prathamesh,
thanks for looking at it.
tracked in PR105900 [0], I'd like to add
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 17:54 +0200, Tim Lange wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi Tim.
Thanks for the patch.
Various comments inline below, throughout...
>
> tracked in PR105900 [0], I'd like to add support for a new warning on
> dubious allocation sizes. The new checker emits a warning when the
> alloca
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 21:25, Tim Lange wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
Hi Tim,
Thanks for posting the POC patch!
Just a couple of comments (inline)
>
> tracked in PR105900 [0], I'd like to add support for a new warning on
> dubious allocation sizes. The new checker emits a warning when the
> allocation s
Hi everyone,
tracked in PR105900 [0], I'd like to add support for a new warning on
dubious allocation sizes. The new checker emits a warning when the
allocation size is not a multiple of the type's size. With the checker,
following mistakes are detected:
int *arr = malloc(3); // forgot to mu
11 matches
Mail list logo
