Re: [RFC] ICE when error_mark_node is gimplified

2015-12-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Hi, > PR 68948 shows a case which has been broken for a long time and very > hard to see. So I am recommending that we introduce an assert inside > the gimplifier if we process an error_mark_node and there was no > errors or sorrys from th

[RFC] ICE when error_mark_node is gimplified

2015-12-16 Thread Andrew Pinski
Hi, PR 68948 shows a case which has been broken for a long time and very hard to see. So I am recommending that we introduce an assert inside the gimplifier if we process an error_mark_node and there was no errors or sorrys from the front-end; I will send a patch if there is a general feeling th