On 01/16/2016 01:56 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:13:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
I still don't understand why you c
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:13:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>>I still don't understand why you can't use fstack-usage. Can you plea
On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Will,
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Will,
>
> On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >>>On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> O
On 01/12/2016 05:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
-fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
assembly code.
No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its o
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> -fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
>> is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
>> assembly code.
>
> No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its output can always be relied upon;
> wh
> -fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
> is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
> assembly code.
No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its output can always be relied upon;
when it cannot compute the maximum stack usage, it prints "unbound
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:11 PM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
> Will,
>
>
> On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
>
Will,
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
So I'd like to intr
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>>So I'd like to introduce a function prologue analyzer to dete
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
Akashi,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
I'm the author of ftrace support on arm64(aarch64) linux. As part of
ftrace, we can utilize "stack tracer" which reports the ma
Hi,
I'm the author of ftrace support on arm64(aarch64) linux. As part of
ftrace, we can utilize "stack tracer" which reports the maximum usage
of kernel stack:
---8<---
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/stack_max_size
4088
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/stack_trace
DepthSize Locatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
